The REAL Reason Scientists Proved We're In A Simulation

Su questo video

There is a one in two chance that you are not real. Neil deGrasse Tyson, America's most famous astrophysicist and Director of the Hayden Planetarium, works through the mathematics with Steven on camera until they arrive at a specific probability. The conclusion is simple and devastating: we are either the very first universe that started everything, or the very last in a chain that cannot yet simulate another. Those are the only two options. Everything in between is a simulation. The argument begins with a premise that Neil confirms is scientifically defensible. If any civilisation eventually develops the computing power to simulate an entire universe with conscious beings who believe they have free will, then that simulated universe will eventually develop the same capability and create another. This chain continues indefinitely. If you close your eyes and throw a dart at all possible universes in that chain, the overwhelming probability is that you hit one of the countless simulated ones rather than the single original. Discover: • The mathematical proof that reduces the odds of being real to one in two • Why we can only be the first or last universe in a simulated chain • How Steven's family tree diagram changes the simulation argument • Why Neil says "I have no way to step to the side of that argument" • The two things Neil does every day to create meaning in life • The tombstone quote that captures his entire philosophy of living • Why aliens landing in LA would think cars are the dominant life form • Why the Big Bang itself might have been a simulation being created 📺 Watch the full episode here - https://youtu.be/PHpsdIHpLUE ❤️ Subscribe to our main channel - www.youtube.com/TheDiaryOfACEO Get your hands on exclusive Diary of a CEO products: https://thediary.com/collections/all?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=experiment&utm_term=clipschannel #thediaryofaceo #doac

Anteprima della trascrizione

Prime 80 frasi di una trascrizione di ~3500+ parole. Leggi il resto con tocca-per-tradurre nell'app Hinto.

If you imagine any rate of improvement at our current trajectory, we get to a point at some at some stage in the future where we can create simulations. >> Yes. Yes.

It's a natural. >> Yeah. We get there, >> but we're not there now. And since we're not there now, we're not one of these middle universes.

>> But if you I mean whether it's 100 years or a thousand years or 10,000 years, we eventually get there. And then if you layer that over with what you said about there being 100 billion galaxies with 100 billion stars, >> um it's conceivable that we are not at the

front of that race. And if we're not at the front of that race, it means that someone else theoretically got there at some point and therefore we might be their simulation. >> Yes, of course.

>> Yes. >> And that seems way more >> No, no, no, no. What I'm saying is >> Yeah. >> Yes, we could be their simulation, but we can't simulate anybody within our world yet.

>> Yeah. Not yet. >> That's why we are either the last one in that list created by some other civilization that can't yet create the next civilization or we're the first one that's authentic

>> or it could be a tree though. It could be like they did one they did they did 500 then this person here did 300. >> Yes. So I'm taking the the very straight line model.

Yes. It could be fully branched out. Yeah. And >> Sure. All I'm saying is we're nowhere in the middle of

that. We have to be at the end because we don't we can't make another universe yet. So that greatly reduces the total number of universes your dart can hit when you toss it against the wall.

You're either the first universe or the last one. And I had it gave it in a line, but it could be the last of any of these. >> Yeah, it could be the last of a tree. Like I think a family tree.

You don't >> That's fine. So how many is how many would the last be? 500, a thousand, whatever that is. There's countless other ones that came before us leading up to that >> and we could have cousin simulations that >> sure

went on and >> it seem that seems more probable in the balance of I can't think of a singular argument that's more convincing that okay if humans eventually get to tech technological advancement thus so that they could create their own simulation then it's conceivable that in such a vast

universe other other living intelligent life got there first you agree that there's intelligent life in the universe Um, it's quite I think it's quite arrogant of us to think that we are the most technologically advanced universe, >> right? No one should be thinking that.

>> So, thus it's a simulation, Neil, >> unless we are not the simulation and we're the original universe that hasn't started the ball rolling yet. >> And could you imagine the odds of that? What would the odds of that be?

>> This is my point. The simplest way is the look the in the line in the straight line example, which we can spread out in just a moment. We're either the starter universe who hasn't figured out how

to make a universe yet. >> Yes. >> Or we're the last in that line which have yet to evolve the capacity to make a universe because it doesn't happen instantly.

La trascrizione continua nell'app Hinto — tocca una parola per tradurla mentre guardi.

Guarda questo video in inglese per imparare l'inglese

Guardare veri video di YouTube in inglese con i sottotitoli è uno dei modi più densi per assorbire la lingua. The REAL Reason Scientists Proved We're In A Simulation di The Diary Of A CEO Clips ti offre ritmo nativo, intonazione naturale e vocabolario che incontrerai davvero nelle conversazioni reali.

Nell'app Hinto, ogni sottotitolo è tocca-per-tradurre. Niente cambio di app, niente pausa al video, niente dizionario. Guarda e basta.